Facebook Twitter Instagram
    Thursday, February 9
    • Home
    • Affiliate Disclosure
    • FTC Statement
    • Privacy Policy
    • Disclaimer
    Facebook Twitter Instagram LinkedIn
    Cannabis illumination
    Green 85
    • Home
    • Cannabis Media

      FSD Pharma and SciCann Therapeutics launch critical cannabis-based research program in Israel

      February 8, 2023

      Choose the Best Time to Harvest your Cannabis Plants with Swami Select | Grow Cannabis Outdoors Ep9

      February 7, 2023

      Kagyu and Coastal Seed Co – Legendary Cannabis Breeder Joins Sproutways Network of B2B Seed Sales

      February 6, 2023

      Cannabis Research Licence for Sensory Studies: The Future for Consumption Lounges in Canada?

      February 5, 2023

      Stoned Fighting: Jiu-Jitsu Meets Cannabis

      February 4, 2023
    • Cannabis News

      Will Cannabis Be Legalised In Australia? | Studio 10

      February 8, 2023

      AgraFlora Organics International uses experience and facilities for a move to cannabis

      February 7, 2023

      Reuters: Ross Gerber – U.S. Cannabis Sector a Long-Term Play

      February 6, 2023

      House Expected To Pass Bill On Marijuana Legalization

      February 5, 2023

      This Week in Cannabis News – July 4 to July 10 2022

      February 4, 2023
    • Cannabis Products

      Beware: Deceptive cannabis products disguised as snacks

      February 8, 2023

      Canadian Cannabis Packaging SUCKS, But Health Canada is Happy. | TokeText Live Episode 008

      February 7, 2023

      Understanding the medicinal cannabis market

      February 6, 2023

      How to Germinate Cannabis Seeds (Cheap & Easy)

      February 5, 2023

      10+ AMAZON ST0NER MUST HAVE’S YOU DIDN’T KNOW YOU NEEDED!!!

      February 4, 2023
    • Shop
    Cannabis illumination
    You are at:Home»Blog»During the EVALI lung crisis, my state banned all vapes. We were wrong.

    During the EVALI lung crisis, my state banned all vapes. We were wrong.

    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email
    Green 85


    Earlier this month, a federally-funded study on vaping-related lung injuries confirmed what experts have been saying for years: Legal, regulated cannabis is far safer and better for public health than products purchased in the illicit market. 

    The new study examined the 2019 outbreak of vaping lung injuries, which sickened thousands of people across the country and killed at least 68. Analyzing state-level data, researchers found that states where marijuana was legal for adults had a 42% lower incidence of cases.

    The lone exception among legal-cannabis states was my home state of Massachusetts, where the incidence of the disease (known as EVALI, or VAPI) was in the top fifth of all U.S. states. Other legal states were in the bottom half. 

    Related

    Vape pen lung injury: Here’s what you need to know

    Observing the ban from inside government

    At the time of the outbreak, I was a marijuana regulator in Massachusetts, one of the initial members of the state’s Cannabis Control Commission.

    This will go down as one of the worst policy mistakes in the history of cannabis regulation.

    As someone who witnessed the state’s response to the crisis firsthand, its failure doesn’t surprise me. It’s the result of what deserves to go down in history as one of the worst policy mistakes in all of cannabis regulation: our governor’s unlawful, ill-advised ban on the sale of all vaping products when the public health problem was at its worst.

    I found out about the ban just a few hours before it was announced, on Sept. 24, 2019. Concern had been steadily growing about a mysterious lung illness that appeared to be linked to vaping, with the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention having activated emergency operations to investigate the precise cause.

    In response, Massachusetts Gov. Charlie Baker announced that he was declaring a public health emergency and banning the sale of all vape products for four months.

    photo-of-massachusetts-governor-charlie-baker
    In Sept. 2019, Massachusetts Gov. Charlie Baker (above) ordered a four-month temporary ban on the sale of all vaping products in the state. The governor made the announcement amid growing concern about the health effects of vaping products. (AP Photo/Steven Senne, File)

    Health officials had poor information

    It was immediately clear to me that the people who made the decision were poorly informed, both on the outbreak and the existing use of marijuana vape products in our state.

    Given that cannabis regulation was my job, I had been watching reports coming from outlets such as Leafly that suggested the problem could be an additive used as a cutting agent in illicit THC vape cartridges.

    On the day the ban was announced, Leafly published an investigative report that traced the journey of a contaminated illicit-market vape cartridge across the globe. But the Massachusetts ban was broad. It included all vape products—cannabis and nicotine e-cigarettes, flavored or unflavored, whether for medical or adult use, licensed or unlicensed. 

    The ban went into place without any input from the Cannabis Control Commission, and I got the sense that obvious questions had been overlooked.

    Related

    Journey of a tainted vape cartridge: from China’s labs to your lungs

    60,000 medical patients ignored

    Many of us asked whether it needed to apply even to medical cannabis patients, for example. We suggested an exemption for products that exclusively vaped cannabis flower rather than cartridges. Nothing changed initially. People using e-cigarettes to quit smoking were rightly given free cessation resources during the ban, but 60,000 registered medical cannabis patients didn’t so much as receive acknowledgment of their existence.

    The administration and some media outlets described the ban vaguely as a “pause” on sales in order to give medical experts time to “collect more information” and “better understand the inherent dangers of vaping both nicotine and marijuana.” But none of that data was being discussed.

    Our local NPR station’s coverage quoted various officials saying that we were the first state to enact such a ban. “I don’t really care” how the crisis was addressed, one lawmaker said at the time, so long as it was addressed. She lamented that Baker didn’t give more “credit to the Legislature.” 

    Illicit market THC carts containing high levels of vitamin E oil, confiscated in New York. (Courtesy New York State Department of Health)
    The real cause of the crisis: Illicit market THC carts containing high levels of vitamin E oil, like these confiscated in New York. (Courtesy New York State Department of Health)

    Knee-jerk bans rarely work

    As someone who had studied drug policy for years, I knew these types of knee-jerk bans tend to be based more on politics than actual evidence. In this case, the decision to ban all vape products only ended up putting Massachusetts residents at higher risk of serious injury or death.

    For my part, I pointed out that purposely pushing people into the illicit market, where the dangerous products circulated, went against every principle of harm reduction and public health. But the decision-makers in the Baker administration seemed to be either unaware of or intentionally ignoring the growing body of evidence linking the outbreak specifically to unregulated THC vape cartridges.

    When the state Secretary of Health and Human Services was asked in an interview to respond to my warning, she didn’t have much of a response. She said: “Our whole point is to bring awareness to the dangers of vaping.” 

    Related

    Leafly investigation: Lax THC vape rules still allow toxins into your lungs

    Warning other states not to follow

    Concerned that other states might follow Massachusetts and also try to institute a ban, which is often the case with bad drug policy decisions like this, I co-wrote with Dr. Michael Sinha from Harvard Medical School an op-ed in the Philadelphia Inquirer urging states not to follow our lead. 

    Businesses and advocates also pushed back on the ban. Multiple lawsuits were filed by both vape sellers and by medical cannabis patients.

    In response to one of these lawsuits, a Massachusetts Superior Court Judge found that the ban was “very likely invalid,” conflicted with our cannabis commission’s regulatory authority, and was made “without consideration and in disregard of facts and circumstances from the public.” The judge pointed out that the longer the ban remained in effect, the more patients would face undesirable choices, including switching to opioids, living with severe pain, or purchasing from the illicit market. 

    Meanwhile, the cases and death count in Massachusetts continued to rise, as did the dangers associated with the illicit market. Soon after the ban took effect, police say a man trying to sell THC vape cartridges in a suburban Whole Foods parking lot started shooting when his customers reportedly wouldn’t pay.

    This is why we regulate, instead of outlawing

    By the time our commission finally regained the authority to regulate marijuana products, in Nov. 2019, the CDC had confirmed that vitamin E acetate was the likely chemical culprit. We quickly put in place a temporary quarantine to ensure the contaminant wasn’t present in any state-regulated cannabis vape products. 

    Not a single VAPI case was traced to a regulated cannabis product in Massachusetts.

    Licensed businesses we worked with were generally helpful and cooperative in the effort, which is more than I can say for the Baker administration. The Department of Public Health ignored our office’s data requests for so long that the commission chairman and I eventually showed up to a public hearing to beg them to tell us whether any of the illnesses could be traced to regulated cannabis products.

    To the best of my knowledge, despite Massachusetts’s unusually high incidence of vaping-related lung injuries, not a single case has been traced to a product sold on our regulated cannabis market.

    Gov. Baker considers harmful ban a success

    In the end, the ban ended six weeks early. But even as it was lifted, Baker remained steadfast. He said he believed the policy had accomplished its objectives and was “mystified” that no other states had followed suit.

    The governor and other supporters of the ban completely abandoned the purported goal of collecting information and discovering the root cause of the illness. Instead, they narrowed their focus to certain nicotine products that played no significant role in the vaping injury outbreak. 

    Sickened lungs show up as cloudy on the left x-ray, and clear after treatment of one suspected VAPI patient in Utah. (Courtesy University of Utah)
    Certain vape additives are associated with lung injury, which shows up as cloudy on the left x-ray, and clear after treatment of one suspected VAPI patient in Utah. (Courtesy University of Utah)

    Using an illicit THC vape problem to outlaw flavored nicotine

    In November 2019, Baker signed a bill into law banning the sale of all flavored tobacco products and held a press conference to laud the reform. Gone was any mention of the vape ban’s initial goals of collecting data and understanding the sources of the outbreak.

    Sitting at the Department of Public Health’s briefing on the new law, I was reminded of the Iraq war, where it eventually became clear that the goal all along had been to use an unrelated tragedy to accomplish a long-held wish for a pet policy. Mission accomplished?

    This ban hurt real people

    I’m no JUUL apologist. I’m a well-documented critic of Big Tobacco, and my think tank Parabola Center has written specific language to disqualify corporations who harm public health and lie about it from participating in the national marijuana industry. My concerns are based on evidence. When leaders disregard evidence and take advantage of emergencies for their own political purposes, they hurt more than their own credibility. They harm public health. They hurt real people.

    Maybe there were good reasons to pass a ban on the sale of flavored nicotine. If so, we never heard them. Instead, evidence continues to demonstrate that our foolish ban led to bankrupt businesses, more illnesses, and unnecessary deaths.

    Shaleen Title's Bio Image

    Shaleen Title

    Shaleen Title is a drug policy activist and attorney who previously served as a commissioner on the Massachusetts Cannabis Control Commission. She is currently the Distinguished Cannabis Policy Practitioner in Residence at The Ohio State University’s Drug Enforcement and Policy Center.

    View Shaleen Title’s articles

    By submitting this form, you will be subscribed to news and promotional emails from Leafly and you agree to Leafly’s Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. You can unsubscribe from Leafly email messages anytime.



    Green 85
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous ArticlePreveCeutical Medical Inc. receives first cannabis shipment at Australia lab
    Next Article New West Summit 2018: Sunniva Presentation. (Cannabis | Tech | Science | Media | Investment)

    Related Posts

    New study says weed doesn’t cause a hangover, questioning drug tests on workers

    February 8, 2023

    The stoner’s guide to a lit Super Bowl Sunday

    February 7, 2023

    Missouri’s best weed strains and products of 2023

    February 6, 2023
    Green 85
    Recent Posts
    • Will Cannabis Be Legalised In Australia? | Studio 10
    • FSD Pharma and SciCann Therapeutics launch critical cannabis-based research program in Israel
    • New study says weed doesn’t cause a hangover, questioning drug tests on workers
    • Beware: Deceptive cannabis products disguised as snacks
    • AgraFlora Organics International uses experience and facilities for a move to cannabis
    Green 85
    Don't Miss

    Will Cannabis Be Legalised In Australia? | Studio 10

    FSD Pharma and SciCann Therapeutics launch critical cannabis-based research program in Israel

    New study says weed doesn’t cause a hangover, questioning drug tests on workers

    Beware: Deceptive cannabis products disguised as snacks

    Popular Posts

    Will Cannabis Be Legalised In Australia? | Studio 10

    February 8, 2023

    FSD Pharma and SciCann Therapeutics launch critical cannabis-based research program in Israel

    February 8, 2023

    New study says weed doesn’t cause a hangover, questioning drug tests on workers

    February 8, 2023
    Recent Posts
    • Will Cannabis Be Legalised In Australia? | Studio 10
    • FSD Pharma and SciCann Therapeutics launch critical cannabis-based research program in Israel
    • New study says weed doesn’t cause a hangover, questioning drug tests on workers
    • Beware: Deceptive cannabis products disguised as snacks
    • AgraFlora Organics International uses experience and facilities for a move to cannabis
    Latest Posts

    New York Marijuana Legalization Bill Signed By Governor Cuomo

    April 1, 2021

    As 4/20 Passes, The Inequalities In Cannabis Policy Are Still Evident

    April 21, 2021

    NFL Marijuana Testing Drastically Scaled Back Under New CBA

    April 30, 2021
    Copyright © 2023. FOR SALE: This Domain & Website is For Sale. Please Call 360 256-1117 or Email thewaymarketing88@gmail.com For All the Details.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.